sotnd conservaleaks

2007-05-16 SDG list of individuals at Rationalwiki.com
2007-05-16 SDG 240 Re: user:favor
2007-05-16 SDG I won't ban anybody just now...
2007-05-16 SDG 241 Re: user:favor
2007-05-16 SDG Human's talk page

I won't ban anybody just now...

karajou <bmac...@excite.com>, Tue, 15 May 2007 22:15:11 -0700:

I'm going to copy elevent pages there and post them here, like this
one:
*******
User talk:Linus M.
>From Rationalwiki.com

Jump to: navigation, search
welcome--PalMDtalk 20:13, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

howdy--PalMDtalk 21:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Didn't last long
23:20, 10 April 2007 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) blocked "Aschlafly
(contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (inapprorpiate user id)
23:20, 10 April 2007 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) blocked "Linus M.
(contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (created inappropriate
accounts)
Well, it was fun, until I learned how MediaWiki works in this respect…
I already have a sock, "Tsetxyorp", and will deploy it if Ed doesn't
unblock me. --Liπus the Turbogeek(contact me) 10:40, 11 April 2007
(CDT)
Crud, it was blocked before I could use it. --Liπus the
Turbogeek(contact me) 10:50, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
Bastards are getting sharp.--PalMDtalk 11:34, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Well, it was "Testproxy" backwards, so… --Liπus the Turbogeek(contact
me) 12:15, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
Hey, I'm working on getting you unblocked. Right now I'm trying to get
in the good graces of Ed Poor and TK to an extent. ColinLRtalk 02:12,
13 April 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Conservapedia: 90/10 Rule Breakers
That page was meant to be deleted. see here.-Icewedge 21:09, 1 May
2007 (CDT)

there was already a much better page on the 90/10 rule. -Icewedge
21:11, 1 May 2007 (CDT)
Thanks! -Icewedge 14:17, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved from "http://www.rationalwiki.com/User_talk:Linus_M."
******

Colin is still active here on CP.

Karajou

karajou <bmac...@excite.com>, Tue, 15 May 2007 22:19:38 -0700:

This large section is from Tmtoulouse talk page:
******

User talk:Tmtoulouse
>From Rationalwiki.com

Jump to: navigation, search
Worryingly messianic.--Bob M 17:33, 28 March 2007 (CDT)

Contents [hide]
1 Data
2 Conservapedia article on Wikipedia
3 that thing you asked me to help on...
4 Ok, I'm new
5 NAMBLA
6 Thanks
7 Terryeo
8 cp:genome

[edit] Data
Is there a database dump out there of Conservapedia? Or did you just
scrape the whole site to generate your own database copy? --Interiot
14:28, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

When you have a chance, check out cp:User:CatWatcher

So, Ashfly has finally decided to eliminate my Contraception stuff.
Feel free to stealth it back in over there.

Sometimes I use Firefox, sometimes IE, sometimes Safari, why?--
PalMDtalk 19:22, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

THat would be great.PalMDtalk 19:24, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Conservapedia article on Wikipedia
<FordPrefect> Awww I got removed from Wikiepdia on Conservapedia
<FordPrefect> ironically Tmtoulouse doesn't understand the "quote X on
himself" issue <FordPrefect> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Conservapedia#Richard_Incident
<FordPrefect> 1. it is acceptable to quote a Bio/blog if you're saying
"So and so said..." <FordPrefect> What I did in the Jesse article was
take him at his word that he DID things. <FordPrefect> 2. You can
quote Conservapedia regardless of its license per "fair use"
<FordPrefect> 3. it is acceptable to use a primary source if it is
authoritative. The logs PROVE that I was de-sysoped and baned (it is
not mere testimony). <FordPrefect> and the dialog on the talk page/
site reflect the conversation between me and Asclafly <FordPrefect>
However if I were to say "I'm not a racist because I promoted these
black people" <FordPrefect> and you said "Andy is not a racist because
he promoted the following black people A, B,C" and cited myself
<FordPrefect> as me DOING that vs me SAYING that...IT is not
authoritative <FordPrefect> though I'm not saying it was wikipedia
worthy ;-)

So I'm not saying you're wrong to delete it (as far as how relevant it
is) just your reasoning is off. It is acceptable and even preferable
to use primary sources in this instance. (the logs and the talk page
on Harding between me/Aschlafly etc)

I just want to make sure my point is understood in regards to the
Jesse thing. Richard 20:08, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

[edit] that thing you asked me to help on...
I'm working on it now --Jtl 02:30, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Did you stop/slow down? I'm trying to make sense of today's traffic
numbers; between midnight & somewhere around 3am (pacific time), there
were about an extra 13000 page views per hour. after that, it slowed
down to just an extra 3000 per hour or so. It's possible the proxy I'm
using is throttling me or is just slower during the day; I don't have
any counter going on my side (should do that). --Jtl 20:11, 24 April
2007 (CDT)
I dropped it down a few notches while I was editing, so have been
bumping slower will increase it up again soon. Tmtoulouse 20:20, 24
April 2007 (CDT)
Bwahhahahahahaha...thanks Tm...Ill try to be subtle to start.
PalMDtalk 21:16, 24 April 2007 (CDT) aka Joyous One (JO)

Okay, tossed some bait into the water at Scientology cp.PalMDtalk
22:30, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

If you know anyone who would be pissed off by Joyous's edits on
Scientology, send them that way.PalMDtalk 23:29, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Youll love the latest reference i put in...someone gonna blow a
thetan.PalMDtalk 00:11, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

I can't seem to recruit any assistance on the freakin page from the x-
tians.--PalMDtalk 09:12, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

Ok we're rockin' now! Unfortunately i can't use a proxy from here, but
there are thousands of users at this current IP so hopefully they dont
associated in a paranoid way with PALMD.--PalMDtalk 12:31, 25 April
2007 (CDT)

Im pretending to work with the bot, but I keep adding little things.
Hmmm...we need some true believers to jump in...for a non-religion,
these scientologists sure get huffy--PalMDtalk 12:54, 25 April 2007
(CDT)

Guess what? I started a Thetan article!!!!! Yeah!!!!--PalMDtalk 13:37,
25 April 2007 (CDT)

I really don't want to work through that discussion but starting it
could be a great beginning of a conflagration. One doesn't realize the
vast differences between Christians until they start arguing theology.
As for me...consider me "half-vast".-- Crackertalk 14:13, 25 April
2007 (CDT)
They haven't bitten at the Thetan article yet, but they're blowing a
gasket at Scientology. Im still waiting for the X-tians.--PalMDtalk
15:03, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

CPAdmin1 to the rescue!!!--PalMDtalk 16:47, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

Number 6!! Yeah!!--PalMDtalk 17:43, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

Ok, I really need Christian support now...im getting tired and its
busy here.--PalMDtalk 18:34, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

Shit, mommy really did let him out...he gutted the new evo project.--
PalMDtalk 19:38, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

OOO..he deleted the sandbox too...what an asshole!!!

Yea, he is a little bitch. I got my perma-ban (since reversed) for
telling him that, and also suggesting he get laid. But if all goes as
planned he should be providing us some entertainment soon so I am
predisposed to forgive him for now. Tmtoulouse 20:26, 25 April 2007
(CDT)
Were Number 4!! Just under Colin! Thank Xenu for user conservative.--
PalMDtalk 08:03, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

I may have pushed it too hard, terryeo might get the boot. On the good
side, Cons asked me to help out on some apologetics projects.--
PalMDtalk 08:22, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

I just linked engram and psychiatry. Hmm, think terryeo will like
that?--PalMDtalk 18:08, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Ok, I'm new
I'm trying to get a handle on what to do over there. Yesterday I just
tried a little rabble-rousing by bringing up crap that was addressed
previously-- e.g. the whole cult thing.

How do you think I should proceed here? I guess I'm looking for tips
on making this more fun for all of us. Zero 08:48, 26 April 2007
(CDT)

Fantastic. I don't know whether to feel warm and fuzzy by all this or
like I'm stuck in a Battle of Algiers sequel. Whatever the feeling, I
like this idea.
Getting down to it: My main goal is to be a time burglar, too. I find
it is easiest to take one of their issues, like scientology, and look
through the archive for contentious debate. better yet, look for
debates on Wikipedia and bring the edit war to their shore. That's all
I did for scientology.
What I am really trying to find--the holy grail (if you will)--of my
CP plot is to find and issue of disagreement within the admins and
Andy. I don't know how possible that is or if it could last that long,
but it sure gets Flippin hard. I would run for admin myself, but my
earliest edits were as a parody and I can't seem to get foxy-proxy to
work on my computer. More thought.
On a personal note, I am a professional editor in North Dakota,
working on Ethanol plants by day and fighting facism, well, by day,
too. That's my stake. Man, I'm glad I found this group. Zero 11:07, 26
April 2007 (CDT)
[edit] NAMBLA
We have to get that NAMBLA presence rolling. Just imagine googling
NAMBLA or CP and getting the other...make me smile.--PalMDtalk 17:02,
26 April 2007 (CDT)

I suppose it is too much to ask Dan Savage (or Jon Stewart?) to help
us googlebomb the term? It would be awesome if each were the second
hit for the other... Huw Powell 21:27, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
We need a hook, we need them to say something really stupid on the
page. Conservative will do it, I would recommend bumping it in the
stats department but that might get it deleted. Tmtoulouse 22:16, 27
April 2007 (CDT)
BTW, Scientology is up to no. 7 on most revisions. TG for Cons.--
PalMDtalk 17:49, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

I didn't want to make it to nauseating, so I voted for Cons with
reservations. He actually lobbied me! What a fucking tool.--PalMDtalk
18:57, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

Building credibility for J.O.--PalMDtalk 19:33, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

This stuff makes me laugh so fucking hard. It's great. Man, I've been
out of the loop for too long! GodlessLiberal 22:36, 27 April 2007
(CDT)
Oh, I feel so liberated. GodlessLiberal 22:52, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
Re Ashfly, let me see what i can do.PalMDtalk 20:06, 29 April 2007
(CDT)

[edit] Thanks
Thanks for inviting me into the cabal :). -Icewedge 21:32, 30 April
2007 (CDT)

[edit] Terryeo
AKA Terry E. Olsen, the official ass boy of Scientology has made it
onto Citizendium (http://www.citizendium.com) and is doing his thing
over there, but not anonymously. It will be interesting to see how he
fares in that particular community.--PalMDtalk 10:15, 1 May 2007
(CDT)

BTW, he has completely cleared his user pages in cp and moved on, it
seems.--PalMDtalk 15:27, 1 May 2007 (CDT)

[edit] cp:genome
Added stuff about similarities between chimps and humans. I'm trying
to be subtle, for now. Sterile 15:22, 1 May 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "http://www.rationalwiki.com/User_talk:Tmtoulouse"
****************

TerryK <terry.92...@gmail.com>, Wed, 16 May 2007 05:20:21 -0000:

Send Andy the login info, explain to him how to do it.  He needs to
remove several Sysops, and now.

Andy, you still up?

--TK

2007-05-16 SDG list of individuals at Rationalwiki.com
2007-05-16 SDG 240 Re: user:favor
2007-05-16 SDG I won't ban anybody just now...
2007-05-16 SDG 241 Re: user:favor
2007-05-16 SDG Human's talk page

Last updated 12 Apr 2011 by Georg Kraml.